massjoinderlitigation.info massjoinderlitigation.info Share this:FacebookTwitterTumblrLinkedInEmailRedditPinterestPrintLike this:Like Loading...
One thought on “massjoinderlitigation.info”
Once again I am asking Attorney General Martha Coakley and the other state Attorney’s General to follow the lead of New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman and stop any settlement talks with the banks. The results of this report are only for my registry, but I can assure you that this type of criminal fraud is rampant across the nation. This leaves me to question why anyone would consider settling with these banks until we know the full extent of the damage that they have caused to the homeowners chain of title across this country and the amount of money they have bilked the taxpayers for their failure to pay recording fees.
This entity can be found within the records of Delaware and the SEC as ACE SECURITIES CORP.
The undersigned, for the purpose of organizing a corporation under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, does hereby certify:
FIRST: The name of the corporation is ACE Securities Corp. (hereinafter called the “Corporation”).
SECOND: The address of the Corporation’s registered office in the State of Delaware is 15 East North Street, Dover, Delaware 19901, in the County of Kent.
The name of its registered agent at such address is Vanguard Corporate Services, LTD.
THIRD: The purpose for which the Corporation is organized is to engage in only the following activities:(a)to authorize, issue, sell, deliver, purchase and invest in (and enter into agreements in connection with), and/or to engage in the establishment of one or more trusts (each, a “Trust”),
Regarding Ace Securities Trusts
Ace Securities Corp · 424B5 · Wells Fargo Financial Auto Owner Trust
Filed On 6/15/05 1:29pm ET · SEC Files 333-119047, -10 ·
Accession Number 1162318-5-476
ASSET BACKED NOTES WELLS FARGO FINANCIAL AUTO OWNER TRUST 2005-A
ISSUER WELLS FARGO FINANCIAL, INC.
MASTER SERVICER WELLS FARGO FINANCIAL RECEIVABLES, LLC
TRANSFEROR ACE SECURITIES CORP.SELLER
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 15
CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE OF TERMINATION OF REGISTRATION UNDER SECTION 12(g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 OR SUSPENSION OF DUTY TO FILE REPORTS UNDER SECTIONS 13 AND 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
Commission File Number 333-119047-10
WELLS FARGO FINANCIAL AUTO OWNER TRUST 2005-A
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
c/o Wilmington Trust Company Rodney Square North, 1100 North Market Street
Wilmington, Delaware 19890-0001 (302) 651-1000
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
Wells Fargo Financial Auto Owner Trust 005-A has caused this certification/notice to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned duly authorized person.
Date: January 30, 2006 By: Wells Fargo Financial, Inc., as Master Servicer By: /s/ Steven N. Owenson
Steven N. Owenson Treasurer
The following chart represents the application of proceeds from investors and the transfer of the receivables:
Ace Securities Corp Home Equity Loan Trust Series 2005-He3 in Charlotte, NC is a private company categorized under Trust Service.
No corporation shall begin the transaction of business until a certificate has been granted. (38 Del. Laws, c. 94, § 10; Code 1935, § 2379; 5 Del. C. 1953, § 733; 57 Del. Laws, c. 740, § 19A.)
Delaware Secretary of Banking Robert Glenns answer was that its office had no records relating to Ace Securities Corporation [copies of all judicially noticed answers from 27 separate Delaware and California agencies are in El Cajon case file 2007-33928 and two other files GIE035214
Blue Sky laws state that anyone who assists in failure to file and effectively manage an agent is actionable as a primary and that this is a federal crime Blue Sky laws form 201 all the parties who formed MERS are therefore equally liable for its losses
Blue Sky Laws
What Does Blue Sky Laws Mean?
State regulations designed to protect investors against securities fraud by requiring sellers of new issues to register their offerings and provide details. This allows investors to base their judgments on trustworthy data.
Secondly they are all actionable and enjoinable as defendants or guilty of aiding and
abetting MERS in unjust enrichment failure to pay transfer and recording fees due and payable upon transfer of a property in their EDS MERSCORP registry which at one time held all mortgages in California [The CHA ordered that all loans on their books be registered through MERS in 2001 by administrative mandate] until I made them aware of MERS suspension by the Secretary of State and FTB in 2004 then they could not transfer the loans out of MERS name fast enough Dont test me I have a copy of the administrative order in my court file at El Cajon the first case of about 10 superior court and small claims cases against Cal Western Reconveyance as trustee consists of 5 two inch folders all of which I went through at the court yesterday
Aiding and abetting is a vehicle for secondary liability that renders an aider and abettor culpable as a principal.
18 U.S.C. § 2 provides as follows:
(a) Whoever commits an offense against the United States or aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces or procures its commission, is punishable as a principal.
(b) Whoever willfully causes an act to be done which if directly performed by him or another would be an offense against the United States, is punishable as a principal.
The aiding and abetting statute serves to complement the offense of conspiracy. Recognizing that conspirators often use willing assistants in carrying out their plans, the statute enables the government to prosecute as principals those who knowingly assist the objectives of a conspiracy but who were not members of it.
As the District of Columbia Circuit noted in United States v. Kegler, aiding and abetting is not a crime in itself. It is a theory of liability that “abolishes the distinction between common law notions of ‘principal’ and ‘accessory.'”
The essential element of a conspiracy is an agreement to violate the law. In contrast, aiding and abetting is not a criminal offense but merely a theory of criminal liability that makes the aider and abettor guilty of whatever substantive or inchoate crime is committed. Aiding and abetting a conspiracy does not necessarily make the aider and abettor a member of the conspiracy.
A prudent prosecutor will pay attention
Anyone else who choses to attempt to interfere in the process can be dealt with under obstruction of justice
A criminal offense that involves interference, through words or actions, with the proper operations of a court or officers of the court.
The integrity of the judicial system depends on the participants’ acting honestly and without fear of reprisals. Threatening a judge, trying to bribe a witness, or encouraging the destruction of evidence are examples of obstruction of justice. Federal and state laws make it a crime to obstruct justice.
Obstruction of justice in the federal courts is governed by a series of criminal statutes (18 U.S.C.A. §§ 1501–1517), which aim to protect the integrity of federal judicial proceedings as well as agency and congressional proceedings. Section 1503 is the primary vehicle for punishing those who obstruct or who endeavor to obstruct federal judicial proceedings.
Section 1503 proscribes obstructions of justice aimed at judicial officers, grand and petit jurors, and witnesses. The law makes it a crime to threaten, intimidate, or retaliate against these participants in a criminal or civil proceeding. In addition, section 1503 makes it illegal to attempt the Bribery of an official to alter the outcome of a judicial proceeding.
Besides these specific prohibitions, section 1503 contains the Omnibus Clause, which states that a person who “corruptly or by threats of force, or by threatening letter or communication, influences, obstructs, or impedes, or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede, the due administration of justice” is guilty of the crime of obstruction of justice. This clause offers broad protection to the “due administration of justice.” Federal courts have read this clause expansively to proscribe any conduct that interferes with the judicial process.
To obtain a conviction under section 1503, the government must prove that there was a pending federal judicial proceeding, the defendant knew of the proceeding, and the defendant had corrupt intent to interfere with or attempted to interfere with the proceeding.
Two types of cases arise under the Omnibus Clause: the concealment, alteration, or destruction of documents; and the encouraging or rendering of false testimony. Actual obstruction is not needed as an element of proof to sustain a conviction. The defendant’s endeavor to obstruct justice is sufficient. “Endeavor” has been defined by the courts as an effort to accomplish the purpose the statute was enacted to prevent. The courts have consistently held that “endeavor” constitutes a lesser threshold of purposeful activity than a criminal “attempt.”
Federal obstruction of justice statutes have been used to prosecute government officials who have sought to prevent the disclosure of damaging information. The Watergate scandal of the 1970s involving President richard m. nixon is a classic example of this type of obstruction. A number of Nixon’s top aides were convicted of obstruction of justice, including former attorney general john n. mitchell.A federal Grand Jury named Nixon himself as an unindicted coconspirator for the efforts to prevent disclosure of White House involvement in the 1972 Burglary of Democratic National Committee headquarters at the Watergate building complex in Washington, D.C