IS the TRUSTEE a Common Agent for ALL Parties? “YES”, say the Experts at Northwest Trustee Services Inc. in Santa Ana, CA., Attny Kathy Shakibi

31 Mar

Foreclosure Nation


Intentional negligence to inform (admit) to the beneficiary or servicer that they (trustee) has knowledge of a borrower with a pending lawsuit challenging who owns the home (mortgage/deed of trust) and whose lawsuit by a reasonable person would be deemed to possibly render the deed of trust VOID, gives the Trustee an EXCUSE for moving forward to a trustee sale. The trustee USES THE pathetic well worn-out excuse that: We didn’t have time to get permission from the beneficiary or servicer to stop the sale; we didn’t find out about the lawsuit in time to ADVISE the beneficiary/servicer; the beneficiary/servicer DID NOT GET BACK to us in TIMELY fashion ALLOWING us to STOP THE SALE.

It has become alarmingly clear, that no one (not courts, not government, and certainly not trustees who supposedly work for both borrower and lender) are MOTIVATED to…

View original post 470 more words

4 Responses to “IS the TRUSTEE a Common Agent for ALL Parties? “YES”, say the Experts at Northwest Trustee Services Inc. in Santa Ana, CA., Attny Kathy Shakibi”

  1. linda April 3, 2012 at 7:23 pm #

    The rest of the article not available. Well, as the Trustor (Grantor) of the Trust on the Deed of Trust, I tried to assign a new trustee and the Los Angeles County Recorder’s office would not let me record the document. That, along with any other type of document. The clerks threatened that if I ever came back with documents such as a Notice of Intent to Preserve an Interest, a Substitute of Trustee, a Quit Claim Deed, and so on, …there would be repercussions.

    This business is obviously rigged.

    Yet, I don’t know if the L.A. County Recorder is even suing MERS yet. Are they?
    Billions of lost revenue there. You’d think they’d want to go after that and not the little guys who are just trying to keep a roof over their heads and stave off the banks from pulling the rugs out from under their feet. Literally.

    • Randy Frodsham April 8, 2012 at 11:29 am #

      Thank your lucky stars that the clerk wouldn’t allow you to record that document.. In the future you may have been charged with aiolating section 115 and 115.5 of the Penal Code which is a felony.

      What you need to consider as an action where the remedy is quiet title. I am not an attorney and do not give legal advice but I can give legal information and suggest strategies I might consider were I in your situation.

      Contact me at 951-286-4400 and/or .

      BTW, I noted the same problem trying to located the rest of this article.

  2. Randy Frodsham April 8, 2012 at 11:38 am #

    I found another source for the article at

    and a related article at

    I going to cut & paste both of these before they disapear as I’m sure they will.

  3. mary April 15, 2012 at 5:38 pm #

    If you google Kathy Shakibi you will find her article

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: